Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ema Burgic Bucko vs Jaeda Daniel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bucko vs Daniel analysis and find out who is favored!
Ema Burgic Bucko vs Jaeda Daniel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bucko 0 - 0 Daniel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bucko has won 35.44% of points on their second serve, while Daniel has won 40.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bucko, in recent form, has won 65.25% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniel has won 59.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 47.58% and 42.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bucko has saved 45.28% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel has saved 53.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bucko has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 8/ 5), with Daniel winning 45.83% (W/L 22/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bucko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 52/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Daniel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 66/ 54), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 66/ 67).
- Player level: In the last year, Bucko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 8/ 5), where as Daniel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.9% of matches (W/L 18/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bucko has played against opponents with an average rank of 103.38 while Daniel has played against players with an average rank of 176.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bucko has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bucko has converted 55.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel has converted 48.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
836
Rank
466
High
31
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
706
Rank
615
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
62% (139-87)
Career Total W/L
52% (137-124)
62% (8-5)
YTD W/L
56% (19-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ema Burgic Bucko | Jaeda Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (8/5) | 56% (19/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (18/13) | 55% (42/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (174/145) | 52% (357/333) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 57% (8/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 55% (11/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.76 | 0.5 |
| DFs Total | 120 | 168 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:36 | 1:50:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 103.38 | 165.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (448/781) | 65% (1440/2208) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (260/448) | 59% (851/1440) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 35% (118/333) | 40% (308/768) |
| BPs Won% Total | 56% (64/115) | 49% (153/314) |
| Return Pts W% | 54% (420/778) | 48% (1116/2302) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (8/5) | 56% (15/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (8/13) | 56% (18/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 14% (1/7) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 89% (18/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 11% (18/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 43% (7/3) | 13% (16/2) |
Ema Burgic Bucko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Robin Anderson
Player
Ema Burgic Bucko
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
14
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ema Burgic Bucko
Player
Kayla Cross
60%
(
70 of
117)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
0
Aces
3
14
Double Faults
11
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
32%
(
15 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
55 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
63 of
121)
125
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(5) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ema Burgic Bucko
Player
Anna Ulyashchenko
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
0
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Ema Burgic Bucko
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
52%
(
33 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ema Burgic Bucko
Player
Taylor Goetz
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
3
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ema Burgic Bucko
Player
Mckenna Schaefbauer
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariana Isabel Higuita Barraza
Player
Ema Burgic Bucko
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
44%
(
44 of
99)
0
Aces
1
15
Double Faults
24
39%
(
26 of
66)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
22%
(
8 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
14 of
55)
65%
(
13 of
20)
Break Points Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
67%
(
68 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
66 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ema Burgic Bucko
Player
Rhea Verma
39%
(
21 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
1
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
14
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
24%
(
8 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
63%
(
34 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
55
Total Points Won
55
|
2-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Jaeda Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Jaeda Daniel
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Jaeda Daniel
82%
(
79 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
48%
(
38 of
79)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
51%
(
49 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaeda Daniel
Player
Whitney Osuigwe
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve %
93%
(
39 of
42)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaeda Daniel
Player
Julia Adams
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanna Chang
Player
Jaeda Daniel
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaeda Daniel
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
101)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaeda Daniel
Player
Elizabeth Danailova
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ariana Anazagasty-Pursoo
Player
Jaeda Daniel
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Jaeda Daniel
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
73%
(
96 of
132)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
13
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
54 of
96)
33%
(
13 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
48%
(
44 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
69 of
132)
116
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaeda Daniel
Player
Jessie Aney
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
-
Aces
-
11
Double Faults
7
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
31%
(
10 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(3) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Bucko Vs Daniel Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bucko are available here and Daniel photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
